Archive for the ‘European Union’ Category

The European urban fabric in the 21st century – Interesting discussions

Thursday, March 29th, 2012

1Some 300 people came together in Copenhagen on 22-23 March at the Fifth European Summit of Regions and Cities. The Summit titled as “The European urban fabric in the 21st century” was organized by the Committee of the Regions (COR), partly for politicians (mayors and presidents of regions from EU countries), partly for leading architects, urban planners and researchers.

Many people criticize such large meetings saying that these are dominated by pompous but empty statements. With enough patience and open ears, however, interesting statements can be “angled out” from the ocean of words. The following aims to be a collection of statements which I found interesting.

In the opening speech of Mercedes Bresso, President of the Comity of the Regions (COR), strong words were used against the Urban Platform (which is one of the novelties planned by the Commissioner for the post 2013 Cohesion Policy regulation). The COR was unhappy about the idea that the Urban Platform would be organized for 300 nominated cities, emphasizing that this plan is not on terms with modern participation practices (open to all cities). According to Bresso’s view the European Parliament also shares these worries. These statements resembled a power game between two institutions (the COR and the Commission) regarding domination over the links to the European cities.

The political importance of the Summit could be seen from the presence and speech of José Manuel Barroso, the President of the European Commission. In an unusually emotional speech Barroso urged for smart and green, sustainable and inclusive growth instead of artificial growth, fuelled by irresponsible financial behaviour. As metropolitan population (living in urban areas over 250 thousand people) makes up 59% of European population, urban areas have to play vital role in the fulfilment of the new types of growth targets. The knowledge based, resource efficient, carbon free economic development of the cities is of key importance, and must be in accordance with the positive valuse of the European model of urban development. Barroso argued strongly for the inclusion of the regional and local level into the discussions over the multi-annual financial framework, even if the national governments are reluctant towards this proposal. The audience could be very satisfied with the arguments used by the president of the Commission with the hope that these were not only compliments towards the regional and local leaders but real priorities to which the Commission will insist in the upcoming difficult negotiations about the future of Cohesion Policy.

While in the debate many COR members (from the regional level and rural areas) questioned or even  opposed the accentuated role planned to be given to the urban areas, Jan Olbrycht, leader of the Urban Intergroup of the European Parliament emphasized the importance of the 5% as a special ringfencing for urban areas and made it clear that this should only be the minimum, i.e. the investments into cities should be much higher.

The second panel (and in my taste the thematically most interesting part of the meeting) was the debate about the involvement of the citizens in regional and local projects. The mayor of Bratislava described the euphoria of people 23 years ago, after the collapse of socialism. This euphoria has turned into apathy in the last years, due to many corruption cases people have lost their trust in elected politicians. Nowadays a new euphoria seems to develop among young people who argue for a new type of policy – they claim that participatory democracy has to be involved into decision making. The mayor of Ghent mentioned many types of social innovations, such as the employment of full time neighbourhood organizers, frequent neighbourhood debates, collection of locally suggested projects, etc. which are frequently and successfully used in his city. According to the mayor of Athens people argue much easier against something than to give positive opinion. It took a lot of work for the council to convince with arguments people about the need of underground parking in dense urban areas! The local leadership has to take enough time and efforts to inform, debate and convince people about new ideas to win their support. This is even more difficult in complex issues, such as area regeneration, where many strategic details have to be decided and it is much more difficult to take different interests and opinions into account. In his summary Simon Güntner expressed his reservations about direct democracy. In his view participative methods do not pay attention to many important aspects, to minority interests, to financial questions … these can only be discussed in the usual structure of political parties, as these represent certain interests (workers, middle class, etc.) . In his view the reactivation and modernization of party politics is needed.

Closing the conference Mercedes Bresso, President of the CoR, said that cities must be in the front line also in the efforts to change mindset about lifestyles and consumption; they present the lowest but finest level of solidarity.

Read more:

Iván Tosics
URBACT Thematic Pole Manager

Discussion on EU Transport White Paper

Thursday, March 31st, 2011

velo3Within the framework of the “Commentvisions” Sustainable Mobility theme (March) a debate was organised in the European Parliament (29th March, 2011) on the “EU white paper: a blueprint for smarter and greener transport”.

Emphasising the fundamental tenet of the internal market – free transfer of people and goods – the importance of transport for economic growth and in the daily lives of citizens is undeniable. However the white paper recognises that within the current urgency accorded to reducing greenhouse gas emissions a “business as usual” approach to transport and mobility cannot be sustained (minimum 60% reduction of GHG from transport needed by 2050 if EU energy targets are to be met).

Keir Fitch, responsible for the co-ordination of the white paper on the future of transport policy in Europe, eloquently set out the main thrust of the proposed strategy which presents a series of radical and valid objectives. So while during the debate representatives of various transport lobbies reacted with some nervousness, few  actively disputed the desirability of halving the use of conventionally fuelled cars in our cities by 2030 and phasing out by 2050, or the reaffirmation of modal shift to rail and maritime options for long distance and freight transport, or the commitments to intermodality and a zero vision on road safety, etc.

However Martin Rocholl director of the transport programme of the European Climate Foundation did place some serious counterpoints to the ambition of the document, not least concerning the lack of concrete indications of how such targets will be realistically implemented. He also raised scepticism on the option to preview most (2/3rds) of the reduction effort between 2030 and 2050 worrying that this is based on a reliance on future technological advancements which cannot be confirmed at the present and may not develop to produce the desired impact in reality. Furthermore in the discussion on alternatively fuelled vehicles the spectre of Fukushima hung heavily over the meeting – posing uncomfortable questions about energy sources to support fully-fledged emobility, for example.

Perhaps the most disappointing aspect of the white paper is the continuing predominantly sectoral nature of the approach. The document pays lip service to urban planning and employment goals but does not appear to make structural links to location policy, transport hub development, connecting rurban hinterlands to TEN nodes…  The concept of conditional Urban Mobility Plans provides no guarantee that a more holistic methodology is in prospect.
Finally the paper clearly states that “Curbing mobility is not an option”. Within the context of attempting not to diminish people’s mobility through the measures proposed, rather to preserve that mobility, this may seem logical. However is it not that “Curbing mobility is not the solution”.  Clearly this cannot deliver the structural trend break required, but surely with the advancement of IT at our disposal – options for more tele (home)- working, virtual conferencing etc. this can also contribute to the multi-pronged package of measures which could ideally be activated as part of an improved integrated approach. Already we are seeing public authorities and private concerns seriously questioning the need for staff travel  as a consequence of crisis spending reviews.

The URBACT project EVUE (electromobility) and particularly the Lead expert Sally Kneeshaw has been actively contributing to the Comment Visions Debate on “ Is sustainable mobility about changing users behaviour or changing transport infrastructure”.

Philip Stein
Thematic Pole Manager

What can we take away from the Cohesion forum?

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

forumThe Cohesion Forum was held in Brussels from 31 January to 1 February 2011. It was organized by the European Commission and the main goal was closure the public consultation launched last November on the future, post-2013 Cohesion Policy. A number of European policy makers, ministers, regional presidents and heads of operational programmes participated in the work, which was opened by Commissioner Barroso and the Hungarian and Polish Prime Ministers. Commissioner Hahn, who is in charge of regional policy, led the forum from beginning to end.

What can we take away from this forum? First, a physical impression that Europe really exists with, of course, its differences and divergences. The audience listened attentively to the presentations, which were for the most part of a very high level and constructive. Commissioner Hahn’s conclusions gave a glimpse of the negotiations in the upcoming months. The key role cities play in the Cohesion Policy was reaffirmed and, as a result, so was the necessity that they be involved in developing operational programmes, along with the importance of integrated development. Yet, one must recognize that cities, as key players in development and inclusion, did not get special treatment at the Forum.

The Commission clearly insisted on the necessity of choosing limited objectives on which the Cohesion Policy should focus, while hoping for tailoring of each operational programme rather than have a uniform approach.

I will end with the objectives of method that will resonate particularly well for URBACT partners: effectiveness, results and impact. And to these three goals can be added another requirement everyone agreed on: simplified procedures. The margin for progress in this area is great, both on a European and a national level. Negotiations over Cohesion Policy content and how it will be implemented are now entering their active phase.

Jean-Loup Drubigny
Head of the URBACT Secretariat

How good are the energy certification “good guys”

Tuesday, November 9th, 2010

housing2While many member states have introduced energy standards to be respected for new (particularly residential) construction in recent years, since 2003 the EU has added an extra stimulus to this process promoting adoption of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD).  Recast in 2009 to strengthen commitment on this issue, the Directive incites the adoption of national energy performance certificates for residential and general utility buildings – firmly establishing the concept of energy labels on the basis of grades (rating) of energy efficiency.

Although the EU directive makes energy performance disclosure mandatory in all member states there has, in the interim, been fairly minimal evaluation of the real take up of and adherence to this principle. Fronted by Dirk Brounen and Nils Kok of Maastricht University, a research report has just been released which provides an interesting insight into the state of play in the Netherlands (Sponsored by RICS Research). In introducing his findings Dirk Brounen emphasises that currently only +/- 50% of member states have officially introduced a certification system in accordance with the directive.

The report focuses on the Netherlands experience by examining housing property sales between January 2008 and September 2009, where since January 2008 technically all transactions in the Dutch housing market need to be accompanied by an energy performance certificate. It also attempts to explain the “green premium” effect derived from market pricing of energy performance certificates. The conclusion is that even by refining down the figures, the green increment still represents an interesting 2.8% positive impact on the transaction price. However of the total number of transactions (194,000 dwelling sales) only 33,000 were in fact effectively labelled, conform the directive, over the sample period. Furthermore the level of labelled transactions has not been constant – and from initial levels which reached just over 25% of housing property sales in early 2008 the proportion of labelled sales had steadily decreased to under 10% by July 2009. This can partly be explained by a peculiarity in the Dutch system which legally allows the buyer to sign a waiver, which frees the seller from his obligation to provide the certificate.

This snapshot report presents an interesting insight on the situation in a country which has “embraced” the directive. It suggests for instance that there would be merit in spreading out this analysis to other countries and it raises many thought provoking questions, not least as regards to what is happening outside the sales market – which represents by far the highest proportion of the housing stock in countries across the EU.

Read more:

Full research report – website

Philip Stein
Thematic Pole Manager

International Roma Day: Roma integration in the spotlights

Friday, April 9th, 2010

romsRoma communities, the European Union’s largest ethnic minority, continue to face persistent discrimination and segregation. On the occasion of the International Roma Day, the European Commission urged Member States in a policy communication published on 7 April 2010 to use EU funds for the social and economic integration of Roma. Ensuring these communities’ access to jobs and non-segregated education, housing and health services is vital to their social inclusion, the report said. The integration of the estimated 10 to 12 million Roma – a population as large as Belgium’s or Greece’s – is a joint responsibility of Member States and EU institutions. A separate report evaluated the progress achieved in integration over the past two years.

In its policy Communication, the Commission outlines an ambitious mid-term programme to meet the biggest challenges for Roma inclusion, including:

  • Mobilising the Structural Funds, including the European Social Fund – which together represent almost half of the EU’s budget – to support Roma inclusion;
  • Taking Roma issues into account in all relevant policy areas at national and EU level, from employment to urban development and from public health to EU expansion;
  • Harnessing the potential of Roma communities to support inclusive growth as part of the Europe 2020 strategy.

URBACT is deeply involved in this process via its Roma-Net project. Indeed, this new URBACT project intends to improve the integration of the Roma population by developing access to key services, active inclusion in the labour market, education and self-help programmes.

Laura Caldironi, URBACT Communication Officer

Debate on the future of cohesion policy: distributive vs allocative policy?

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

richerregionWhithin the framework of the current debate on the future of the European Cohesion policy it is important to look at the goals that cohesion policy should pursue to meet the challenges of the 21st century. One of the difficult policy issues is whether relatively richer regions should be eligible for expenditure from the Structural Funds, especially if these richer regions also happen to be in relatively prosperous Member States. That is the contentious question raised by the latest working paper on regional research and indicators produced by the European Commission’s DG REGIO. Much of the debate turns on whether Cohesion Policy is understood as being predominantly about distributive transfers or as a policy that is intended to promote economic change and development.  What is the primary role of Cohesion Policy, distributive, allocative?  The question remains open…

Laura Caldironi, URBACT Communication Officer

Catherine Ashton, first High Representative for Foreign Affairs – a step forward for women in politics?

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

ashton2Catherine Ashton, previously EU Commissioner for Trade joined an illustrious group of women who have been Foreign Ministers in the world when she became EU’s new foreign affairs chief in November. She will rank only behind Hilary Clinton and Angela Merkel as one of the most powerful women in politics, representing half a billion EU citizens. As Trade Commissioner over the previous year she has developed a good reputation in global arenas and is seen by many as having a straightforward, practical and businesslike approach that will prove a strong basis for the tasks of the post. The appointment holds an additional significance. It offers a message for other women involved in politics throughout the EU. The current European Parliament comprises 31% women and 69% men. Margot Wallstrom, Vice President of the EU, argued early in 2009 that, “ 2009 offers some excellent opportunities for EU leaders and citizens to show that they are seriously interested in gender equality “. Catherine Ashton’s appointment may not show a major transformation in the position of women within European politics but for many women acting in local, national and international arenas it provides a valuable and positive role model for the future.

Suzi Kvas
WEED (Women, Entreprise and Employment in Local Development) project Lead Partner

A new kind of European cooperation: macro-regional strategies?

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

Eu Strategy for the baltic Sea RegionOn 17 and 18 September, European Commissioner Paweł Samecki attended a ministerial conference in Stockholm, Sweden on the European Union’s strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. This strategy, which is a first at European level, is set to be adopted officially by the Member States at the end of October. The 27 ministers discussed the possibility of other macro-regions following the Baltic example. On this occasion, Commissioner  Samecki presented a new discussion paper on this subject that contains proposals for definitions, fields of application and objectives for other macro-regional strategies.

It is explained in the document’s conclusion that a macro-regional strategy can provide a useful structure and approach for addressing the challenges and opportunities of a region. Could the concept of macro-regional strategies become a model for EU cooperation in other regions and also  an important medium for programming and delivering EU funding? This question may well be a key issue in the broader debate on the future EU Cohesion Policy post-2013…

 Laura Caldironi

YES WE CAN (address the climate changes) !

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

It could be the leitmotiv of the new Swedish Presidency of the EU.

The European Parliament fixed very ambitious objectives in the “Climate change package” adopted last year (see this URBACT newsletter article to know more). To reach these objectives is now one of Sweden’s main priorities.

No more rhetoric, but bold agreements and decisions are expected. Especially during the UN climate conference in Copenhagen next December. The multilateral negotiations held during the coming months will be crucial to reach an “effective agreement” : Sweden wants Europe to be a lead actor of these negotiations.

Today, Europe battles its most severe economic recession in decades. In this context, what are the strengths of the EU and of its Swedish presidency to carry out this challenge successfully ?
Anne-Laure Guignard

Labour mobility between regions : do the United States do better than Europe ?

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009
Labour Mobility

Labour Mobility

It is true : American workers move more often to another region than their European counterparts.

Is it part of their culture or a consequence of incentive policies or legislations?
In Europe, what brings working populations in moving ? Why is a particular region more attractive than another?
If you’re interested in better understanding labour mobility, read this interesting and short document from the European Commission’s DG Regio.